Add to ORKGFollowing the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals seeking a re-trial to receive harsher sentences. This examination argues that such a result is unconstitutional
The “watershed” doctrine gives prisoners a constitutional basis to reopen their cases based on a new...
At common law there was no right to an appeal. Such a right could only be established by legisla...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government must provide a criminal def...
Following the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals ...
From the Symposium: Fifty Years of Gideon: The Past, Present, and Future of the Right to Counsel
During the 1962 Term, the Supreme Court, on a single Monday, announced six decisions concerned with ...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, twenty-three state attorneys general, led by Walter F. Mondale and Edward M...
“Your Honor, I request this Court to appoint counsel to represent me in this trial,”1 stated defenda...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court unanimously held that indigent state felony defendants ar...
Gideon v Wainwright is an icon of criminal procedure. The case, decided in 1963, established the con...
The notion that a criminal defendant ought to have the benefit of a lawyer—paid for by the governmen...
Barker v. Wingo, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Vermont v. Brillon discuss principles and declarations of...
Once the darling of the legal academy, criminal procedure has fallen into disrepute. Thirty-five yea...
The “watershed” doctrine gives prisoners a constitutional basis to reopen their cases based on a new...
At common law there was no right to an appeal. Such a right could only be established by legisla...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government must provide a criminal def...
Following the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals ...
From the Symposium: Fifty Years of Gideon: The Past, Present, and Future of the Right to Counsel
During the 1962 Term, the Supreme Court, on a single Monday, announced six decisions concerned with ...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, twenty-three state attorneys general, led by Walter F. Mondale and Edward M...
“Your Honor, I request this Court to appoint counsel to represent me in this trial,”1 stated defenda...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court unanimously held that indigent state felony defendants ar...
Gideon v Wainwright is an icon of criminal procedure. The case, decided in 1963, established the con...
The notion that a criminal defendant ought to have the benefit of a lawyer—paid for by the governmen...
Barker v. Wingo, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Vermont v. Brillon discuss principles and declarations of...
Once the darling of the legal academy, criminal procedure has fallen into disrepute. Thirty-five yea...
The “watershed” doctrine gives prisoners a constitutional basis to reopen their cases based on a new...
At common law there was no right to an appeal. Such a right could only be established by legisla...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government must provide a criminal def...